Show Less
You do not have access to this content

Advanced Introduction to International Trade Law

Michael J. Trebilcock

A second and fully updated edition of the book previously entitled Understanding Trade Law, this book presents an accessible yet nuanced introduction to the basic structure and principles of international trade law. It explores the development of the international trade law regime, principally GATT and WTO law, and through clear and concise discussion of the many developments that have arisen, gives a streamlined overview of this notoriously complex area of legal study.
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

2  Dispute settlement under the WTO

Michael J. Trebilcock

Extract

In initial negotiations after World War II for the creation of a multilateral trading system, negotiating countries failed to adopt the Havana Charter, which would have led to the creation of the International Trade Organization (ITO). The GATT, as a provisional agreement, by default became a permanent framework for the multilateral trading system. It established an anaemic institutional structure that member countries, by consensus, elaborated over time. Initial disputes were referred to the Chairman of the Contracting Parties for rulings on the legality of disputed measures – a process for which there was no provision in the GATT – and then evolved into the creation of five member Working Parties, comprising representatives of the two parties in dispute (member countries) and representatives of three other countries. These Working Parties were conceived as largely serving a diplomatic or conciliatory function where attempts were made to work out compromises acceptable to both disputing parties. In turn, by the mid-1950s Working Parties had evolved into something similar to the current Panels, typically comprising five individuals in their personal capacities and excluding representatives of the countries in dispute. These Panels would hear confidential written and oral submissions from the parties and make recommendations to the General Council of the GATT, which, by convention, required a positive consensus (including the acquiescence of the losing party) for their adoption. In the event of adoption, the Contracting Parties would recommend remedial measures to the party found in violation of its GATT obligations and in the event of failure to...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.