Show Less
You do not have access to this content

Advanced Introduction to U.S. Criminal Procedure

Christopher Slobogin

In this Advanced Introduction, Christopher Slobogin covers every significant aspect of U.S. criminal procedure. Focusing on Supreme Court cases and the most important statutory rules that provide the framework for the criminal justice system, he illuminates the nuances of American criminal procedure doctrine and offers factual examples of how it is applied. Chapters cover police practices such as search and seizure, interrogation, and identification procedures, as well as the pretrial, trial and post-conviction process.
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

The threshold of the Fourth Amendment

Christopher Slobogin

Extract

The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads in full:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

While there is considerable debate over the meaning and intent of this language, all agree that the primary reason it was included in the Bill of Rights was the Framers’ reaction to English abuse of the warrant process in the years preceding the Revolutionary War. Particularly galling to the colonists was the profligate use of “writs of assistance,” which authorized constables to obtain “assistance” in seizing, at their discretion, any “prohibited or uncustomed” goods from houses, shops, and any “other Place.” In contrast to the traditional common law warrant, which was issued by a justice of the peace when a citizen swore there was probable cause to believe stolen property could be found in a particular home, these “general warrants” gave British soldiers carte blanche to search any place they thought might contain contraband. The colonist James Otis called the writ of assistance “the worst instrument of arbitrary power, the most destructive of English liberty, and the fundamental principles of law, that ever was found in an English law book, [because it placed] the liberty of every man in the hands of...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.