Show Less
You do not have access to this content

Advanced Introduction to U.S. Criminal Procedure

Christopher Slobogin

In this Advanced Introduction, Christopher Slobogin covers every significant aspect of U.S. criminal procedure. Focusing on Supreme Court cases and the most important statutory rules that provide the framework for the criminal justice system, he illuminates the nuances of American criminal procedure doctrine and offers factual examples of how it is applied. Chapters cover police practices such as search and seizure, interrogation, and identification procedures, as well as the pretrial, trial and post-conviction process.
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

The warrant and probable cause requirements

Christopher Slobogin


If government agents conduct a nonconsensual search or seizure, as described in the previous chapter, the Fourth Amendment is implicated and the conduct must be “reasonable.” A search or seizure authorized by a valid warrant based on probable cause is almost always reasonable. Of course, as the next chapter details, the absence of a valid warrant does not necessarily make the police conduct unreasonable; in fact, the “vast majority” of searches and seizures are not authorized by a warrant.1 However, when a police search or seizure is particularly intrusive, as with an arrest in or search of a home, a warrant tends to be required, because these are situations in which the Fourth Amendment’s reasonableness standard should be most demanding.

The warrant is seen as the preeminent protection afforded by the amendment because, as Justice Robert Jackson put it, the warrant process ensures that the inferences that justify the search or seizure are “drawn by a neutral and detached magistrate” rather than “the officer engaged in the often competitive enterprise of ferreting out crime.”2 To obtain a warrant, an officer must prepare an application, a supporting affidavit, and often a draft of the warrant itself, and then submit the paperwork to a judge; although officers can find this process “burdensome, time-consuming, intimidating, frustrating, and confusing,”3 they often seek help from prosecutors and, in most jurisdictions, can file the warrant telephonically, which reduces the effort and time required.4 While a study of warrant practice in seven cities...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.