Show Less
You do not have access to this content

Advanced Introduction to U.S. Criminal Procedure

Christopher Slobogin

In this Advanced Introduction, Christopher Slobogin covers every significant aspect of U.S. criminal procedure. Focusing on Supreme Court cases and the most important statutory rules that provide the framework for the criminal justice system, he illuminates the nuances of American criminal procedure doctrine and offers factual examples of how it is applied. Chapters cover police practices such as search and seizure, interrogation, and identification procedures, as well as the pretrial, trial and post-conviction process.
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Exceptions to the warrant and probable cause requirements

Christopher Slobogin

Extract

are neither few nor well-delineated. The post-Warren Court has tended to focus on whether a search or seizure was reasonable, rather than on whether a warrant could or should have been obtained, and thus has tended to produce rulings that are case-specific rather than rule-oriented, with the result that neither a warrant nor probable cause is required in a large number of situations.

The oldest and most common reason given for forgoing a warrant is “exigency”—the concern that police or others will be harmed or that evidence will be destroyed if the police take the time to obtain a warrant. The most common reason given for permitting a search or seizure on less than probable cause is the perception that the action in question is relatively unintrusive. The modern tendency has been to define exigency broadly and intrusiveness narrowly. Other rationales for justifying particular exceptions to the warrant and probable cause standards include the minimal consequence of finding evidence of wrongdoing, the benign motives or lack of expertise of the enforcing government officials, the existence of other constraints that are thought to provide a sufficient substitute for a warrant, and, as the next section makes clear, tradition.

Of all of the routine police actions that implicate the Fourth Amendment, a custodial arrest—an arrest that results in the police taking the individual into custody for booking—is the most significant. But while such an arrest must be based on probable cause to believe the person...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.