Show Less
You do not have access to this content

Advanced Introduction to U.S. Criminal Procedure

Christopher Slobogin

In this Advanced Introduction, Christopher Slobogin covers every significant aspect of U.S. criminal procedure. Focusing on Supreme Court cases and the most important statutory rules that provide the framework for the criminal justice system, he illuminates the nuances of American criminal procedure doctrine and offers factual examples of how it is applied. Chapters cover police practices such as search and seizure, interrogation, and identification procedures, as well as the pretrial, trial and post-conviction process.
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Post-adjudication proceedings

Christopher Slobogin



Notwithstanding the fact that it determines whether, and for how long, offenders will be incarcerated, the sentencing process can be remarkably informal. While sentencing is considered a critical stage for purposes of the right to counsel, other Sixth Amendment rights either do not apply at all, or only minimally so. There is no federal constitutional right to a jury at sentencing except in capital cases;1 while a trial jury must find beyond a reasonable doubt the facts required to justify a sentence beyond the statutory or mandatory guidelines maximum (see §10.3.1), other sentencing facts can be found by a judge, need not be proven by more than a preponderance of the evidence, and can even consist of conduct that led to acquittal.2 Defendants are entitled to be present during sentencing, and have a right to remain silent during it.3 But they do not have a right to testify in the normal sense, only a right to “allocution” (a statement by the defendant that can be restricted to a plea for mercy).4 Nor is there a right to confront accusers or to compulsory process at sentencing; thus, in non-capital cases hearsay is admissible and “sentencing decisions may be based upon unsworn written assertions by probation officers, prosecutors, police, victims and others in presentence reports, sentencing worksheets, or other documents that are never made public and that the defendant and his counsel never see.”5

The historical explanation for this state of affairs is that, in...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.